The Most Awaited Results on The Ayodhya Verdict case Has come from Allahabad HC. Sixty years after it first went to court, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has pronounced verdict on the Ayodhya title suit.
Court had ruled that the place where the idol of Ram was kept was the birthplace of the deity and the idols should not removed.
| Read the Judgement : Ayodhya Judgement I | II | III | IV | What is NIRMOHI AKHARA ? |
| Judgement in Text | Allahabad High Court Verdict |
Judgement are as follows:
Three-judge bench had ruled in a majority judgement 2:1, that one-third part of the disputed land should be given to the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for 'Ram Lalla'.
The Summary
Idols not to be removed
Disputed land to be divided on 3 parts
Divisions of land to be start within 3 month
Status Quo for 3 months
1 part each to Hindus and Muslim
The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court comprising Justice S U Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice D V Sharma, delivered the judgement today.
The dispute at hand is about whether the 2.7 acres of disputed land on which the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished on December 6, 1992, belongs to the Sunni Central Waqf Board or to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha.
The judgment by the three-judge bench has been put up at the court's website--http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/ayodhyabench.html -
A social journalist, reporting on social and crime happening in the city of Patna along with the other places in the state of Bihar & Jharkhand.
Contact Me at my whatsapp - +91 (8521)(327574)
कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें